IBM, but Apple played it off as experimental). Tiger with an extra hidden x86 binary, which drew some red flags at Processors, but ultimately it just couldn't get Apple what it needed,Īnd the die was cast well in advance for Intel to take over in a plotīy mid to late 2004, Apple had already begun development on it's
IBM kept promising faster, cooler, more efficient G5, and IBM had also promised 3 GHz G5 processors for desktops and did Time wore on, the technology was never miniaturized to make a PowerBook Later models, such as the dual-core and quad-core Late 2005 units. Setting through an array of complex fan placements in air cooled casesĪnd with notorious liquid cooling systems that were prone to failure in Give Apple the answers it wanted, and the rest is history, as theyĪpple engineers figured out how to cope with the G5 in a desktop (if not impossible) to bring a PowerBook G5 to the market alongsideĪpple's G5 desktops. Apple engineers had called G5Ĭhips a "thermal nightmare" and knew that it was going to be difficult Going (sometime around late 2002 to early 2003 when the desktop
The Power Mac G5, and asked IBM to provide a mobile G5 in the early went to IBM, which supplied the PowerPC chips in Never a PowerBook G5 and why the G5 was abandoned so quickly in favor Get into that, here's a bit of a back story on that - and why there was The answer to that is a lot more than meets they eye, but before I PowerPC G5 have to do with Sony and Microsoft? With IBM, which signaled the end of the PowerPC era: What does the
One that has a lot to do with Apple and its relationship that crumbled A question that eludes many in the circles of gaming everywhere is
0 kommentar(er)
